Talk:SIG Sauer P226
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the SIG Sauer P226 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 100 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Point of View
[edit]Not exactly what one would call a neutral point of view.
- If you feel a change is needed, feel free to make it yourself! Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone — including you — can edit any article by clicking the edit this page tab at the top of the page. You don't even need to log in, although there are several reasons why you might want to. Wikipedia convention is to be bold and not be afraid of making mistakes. If you're not sure how editing works, have a look at How to edit a page, or try out the Sandbox to test your editing skills. New contributors are always welcome. -- Grunt 🇪🇺 00:40, September 23 2004 (UTC)
Long entry now stub
[edit]What the hell?? I made a huge long entry about the SIG, and now its a tiny little stub. >;-[ Oh well, I guess thats what it's all about. --User:Gmarine3000 22:43, 11 October 2004
- SIG 229 has a MILLED stainless steel slide, not a forged one. (User: Skull-1)
Canadian Forces
[edit]As far as I am concerned, the P226 is still limited issue to JTF2, MPs, and the like, and there are no plans for further issue... Since there are thousands of stored BHPs to be used. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.100.242.218 (talk • contribs) 22:23, 16 June 2007
Mk25 v. Navy
[edit]From my understanding, the Navy edition is simply a tribute model, while the Mk25 is actually identical to the SEAL's standard issue. The Mk25 features an enhanced trigger, more accurate barrel, a MIL-SPEC rail, and upgraded night sights, which the Navy does not feature. Is this enough to differentiation to remove the Mechanically/Functionally identical sentence, as they are, in fact, not identical?
- C-Class military history articles
- C-Class military science, technology, and theory articles
- Military science, technology, and theory task force articles
- C-Class weaponry articles
- Weaponry task force articles
- C-Class European military history articles
- European military history task force articles
- C-Class German military history articles
- German military history task force articles
- C-Class Cold War articles
- Cold War task force articles
- C-Class Post-Cold War articles
- Post-Cold War task force articles
- C-Class Firearms articles
- Low-importance Firearms articles
- WikiProject Firearms articles
- C-Class Switzerland articles
- Low-importance Switzerland articles
- All WikiProject Switzerland pages