Jump to content

Open Source Initiative

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Open Source Initiative
FormationFebruary 8, 1998 (26 years ago) (1998-02-08)
TypeStandards organization[1]
Location
Area served
Worldwide
Executive Director
Stefano Maffulli (September 2021 – present)
Budget
US$209,500 (2019)[3]
Revenue
US$209,500 (2019)[4]
Websiteopensource.org

The Open Source Initiative (OSI) is a California public benefit corporation "actively involved in Open Source community-building, education, and public advocacy to promote awareness and the importance of non-proprietary software".[5]

Governance

[edit]

The OSI is a California public-benefit nonprofit corporation, with 501(c)(3) tax-exempt status.[6] It adopted a closed rather than membership-driven organizational model in order to build consensus around its definition. All authority is vested in its Board of Directors, and future boards are appointed by the current board. This governance model has hampered OSI's efforts to achieve other goals not related to the definition. Unlike other free and open-source organizations, it does not develop software, which means that volunteer efforts have been directed elsewhere.[1]

In 2008, the OSI attempted to reform its governance, inviting fifty people onto a private mailing list, but this attempt led to no publicly available result.[1] In 2012, the organization again tried to transition towards a membership-based structure, creating affiliate and individual memberships without any formal say over the organization. A plan for corporate membership was also announced, but has not materialized as of 2022. The motivation for adopting a membership-based structure is to obtain greater financial resources, enabling full-time positions to increase the organization's effectiveness.[1][7]

In March 2021, the OSI organization held a vote for executive director among its members, but the results were annulled because the election was hacked.[8] The election was re-run and Stefano Maffulli appointed its first executive director in September 2021.[9]

Open Source Definition

[edit]
Main article: the Open Source Definition

The Open Source Definition is the most widely accepted standard for open-source software.[10][11] Providing access to the source code is not enough for software to be considered "open-source": it must also allow modification and redistribution under the same terms and all uses, including commercial use.[12] The Open Source Definition requires that ten criteria be met for a license to be approved.[13][1] It allows both copyleft—where redistribution and derivative works must be released under a free license—and permissive licenses—where derivative works can be released under any license.[1][14][15] Software licenses covered by the Open Source Definition also meet the Free Software Definition and vice versa. Both the Free Software Foundation and the OSI share the goal of supporting free and open-source software.[1]

License approval process

[edit]

The OSI approves certain licenses as compatible with the definition, and maintains a list of compliant licenses. New licenses have to submit a formal proposal explaining the rationale for the license, comparison with existing approved licenses, and any legal analysis. The proposal is discussed on the OSI mailing list for at least 30 days before being brought to a vote and approved or rejected by the OSI board. Although the OSI has made an effort to have a transparent process, the approval process has been a source of controversy.[16]

Seven approved licenses are particularly recommended by the OSI as "popular, widely used, or having strong communities":[16]

  1. Apache License 2.0
  2. BSD 3-Clause and BSD 2-Clause Licenses
  3. All versions of the GPL
  4. All versions of the LGPL
  5. MIT License
  6. Mozilla Public License 2.0
  7. Common Development and Distribution License (CDDL)
  8. Eclipse Public License version 2.0

Open Source AI Definition

[edit]

In 2022, OSI began work on an Open Source AI Definition (OSAID), inviting select researchers and corporate representatives to make a draft. Even companies with accessible code often do not release the data set used to train the model and impose usage restrictions on what can be done with the trained model. Maffulli said a new definition was necessary because artificial intelligence "is different from regular software and forces all stakeholders to review how the Open Source principles apply to this space". Open Source Definition author Bruce Perens was skeptical about the need to address AI separately, claiming it is going to confuse the open source brand because the existing definition applies to all sofware.[17][18]

The release of the Open Source Artificial Intelligence Definition (OSAID), version 1.0 in November, 2024 opened up new disagreements and considerable ill-feeling, further stirring up ongoing tensions. OpenUK CEO Amanda Brock said it was a mistake as the market will shift and change, noting that it undermines longevity by creating confusion and dispersing resources. She also referred to the absence of dedicated definitions for mobile and cloud, which would have been "very inappropriate". There were questions about whether such a definition is useful for policymakers, researchers, and technologists.[19][20]

History

[edit]

As a campaign of sorts, "open source" was launched in 1998 by Christine Peterson, Jon "maddog" Hall, Larry Augustin, Eric S. Raymond, Bruce Perens, and others.[21][22]

The group adopted the Open Source Definition for open-source software, based on the Debian Free Software Guidelines. They also established the Open Source Initiative (OSI) as a steward organization for the movement. However, they were unsuccessful in their attempt to secure a trademark for 'open source' to control the use of the term.[23] In 2008, in an apparent effort to reform governance of the organization, the OSI Board invited 50 individuals to join a "Charter Members" group; by 26 July 2008, 42 of the original invitees had accepted the invitations. The full membership of the Charter Members has never been publicly revealed, and the Charter Members group communicated by way of a closed-subscription mailing list, "osi-discuss", with non-public archives.[24]

In 2012, under the leadership of OSI director and then-president Simon Phipps, the OSI began transitioning towards a membership-based governance structure. The OSI initiated an Affiliate Membership program for "government-recognized non-profit charitable and not-for-profit industry associations and academic institutions anywhere in the world".[25] Subsequently, the OSI announced an Individual Membership program[26] and listed a number of Corporate Sponsors.[27]

On November 8, 2013, OSI appointed Patrick Masson as its general manager.[28] From August 2020 to September 2021, Deb Nicholson was the interim general manager.[29] Under the direction of Deborah Nicholson, the interim manager, the voting and election was held with results and then halted and set for re-election due to vulnerabilities in the election process. "This week we found a vulnerability in our voting processes that was exploited and had an impact on the outcome of the recent Board Election."[30] No election results or further updates are posted as of June 2021.[citation needed]

In November 2020 the board of directors announced a search for an executive director[31] which was concluded in September 2021 with the appointment of Stefano Maffulli. At the same time, the role of president of the board was abandoned in favor of chair of the board.

Controversy

[edit]

In October 2009, the OSI lost its corporate status, having been suspended by the state of California for failing to submit paperwork on time.[32]

In January 2020, founder Bruce Perens left OSI over controversy regarding a new license (the Cryptographic Autonomy License), which had been proposed for the OSI's approval.[33] Later, in August 2020, Perens elaborated on his concerns: "We created a tower of babel of licenses. We did not design-in license compliance, and we have a tremendous noncompliance problem that isn't getting better. We can't afford to sue our copyright infringers."[34][35]

Eric S. Raymond, another co-founder of the OSI, was later banned from the OSI mailing list in March 2020.[35] He had claimed "OSI has been suborned and is betraying its founding commitment to freedom" the month prior.[36]

The release of the Open Source AI Definition (OSAID) was controversial, opening up new disagreements and considerable ill-feeling.[19]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b c d e f g Gardler, Ross; Walli, Stephen R (2022). "Evolving Perspective on Community and Governance". Open Source Law, Policy and Practice. Oxford University Press. pp. 47–48, 52. doi:10.1093/oso/9780198862345.003.0002. ISBN 978-0-19-886234-5.
  2. ^ "Charity Navigator - Unrated Profile for Open Source Initiative". Archived from the original on 2019-05-12.
  3. ^ "Charity Navigator - Unrated Profile for Open Source Initiative". Archived from the original on 2019-05-12.
  4. ^ "Charity Navigator - Unrated Profile for Open Source Initiative". Archived from the original on 2019-05-12.
  5. ^ "About the Open Source Initiative". Open Source Initiative. Open Source Initiative. Retrieved 24 November 2024.
  6. ^ Boehm, Mirko; Eisape, Davis (2021). "Standard setting organizations and open source communities: Partners or competitors?". First Monday. doi:10.5210/fm.v26i7.10806. ISSN 1396-0466.
  7. ^ Vaughan-Nichols, Steven (18 July 2012). "New life for the Open Source Initiative". ZDNET. Retrieved 19 May 2024.
  8. ^ Vaughan-Nichols, Steven (March 24, 2021). "Open Source Initiative election hacked". ZDNET. Retrieved 19 May 2024.
  9. ^ Vaughan-Nichols, Steven J. "The Open Source Initiative names Stefano Maffulli as its first Executive Director". ZDNet. Retrieved 2021-09-20.
  10. ^ Mertic, John (2023). Open Source Projects - Beyond Code: A blueprint for scalable and sustainable open source projects. Packt Publishing Ltd. p. 5. ISBN 978-1-83763-385-2.
  11. ^ De Maria, Carmelo; Díaz Lantada, Andrés; Di Pietro, Licia; Ravizza, Alice; Ahluwalia, Arti (2022). "Open-Source Medical Devices: Concept, Trends, and Challenges Toward Equitable Healthcare Technology". Engineering Open-Source Medical Devices. Cham: Springer International Publishing. p. 4. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-79363-0_1. ISBN 978-3-030-79362-3.
  12. ^ Greenleaf, Graham; Lindsay, David (2018). Public Rights: Copyright's Public Domains. Cambridge University Press. p. 485. ISBN 978-1-107-13406-5.
  13. ^ Erlich, Zippy (2007). "Open Source Software". Handbook of Research on Open Source Software. IGI Global. pp. 187–188. ISBN 978-1591409991.
  14. ^ Meeker, Heather J. (2008). The Open Source Alternative: Understanding Risks and Leveraging Opportunities. John Wiley & Sons. pp. 21–22. ISBN 978-0-470-25581-0.
  15. ^ Laurent, Andrew M. St (2004). Understanding Open Source and Free Software Licensing: Guide to Navigating Licensing Issues in Existing & New Software. O'Reilly Media, Inc. pp. 9–11. ISBN 978-0-596-55395-1.
  16. ^ a b Smith, P McCoy (2022). "Copyright, Contract, and Licensing in Open Source". Open Source Law, Policy and Practice. Oxford University PressOxford. pp. 108–111. doi:10.1093/oso/9780198862345.003.0003. ISBN 978-0-19-886234-5.
  17. ^ Claburn, Thomas (16 May 2024). "Open Source Initiative tries to define Open Source AI". www.theregister.com. Retrieved 18 May 2024.
  18. ^ Gent, Ed (March 25, 2024). "The tech industry can't agree on what open-source AI means. That's a problem". MIT Technology Review. Retrieved 18 May 2024.
  19. ^ a b Gall, Richard (2024-11-18). "The Open Source AI Definition: What the Critics Say". The New Stack. Retrieved 2024-11-24.
  20. ^ Wiggers, Kyle (2024-10-28). "We finally have an 'official' definition for open source AI". TechCrunch. Retrieved 2024-11-08.
  21. ^ "History of the OSI".
  22. ^ "A Look Back at 10 Years of OSI". Archived from the original on 2018-04-29.
  23. ^ http://www.opensource.org/pressreleases/certified-open-source.php Announcement of losing 'open source' trademark
  24. ^ "OSI Charter Member Discuss List". Archived from the original on 2013-04-21. Retrieved 2012-06-19.
  25. ^ "Become an OSI Affiliate". 22 May 2012.
  26. ^ "OSI Announces Individual Membership".
  27. ^ "OSI Corporate Sponsors". 23 July 2023.
  28. ^ "OSI Names New General Manager". LWN. 2013-10-23. Retrieved 2014-01-27.
  29. ^ "Deb Nicholson to Join Open Source Initiative as Interim General Manager". Software Freedom Conservancy. Retrieved 2021-02-16.
  30. ^ "OSI election update".
  31. ^ "OSI Seeks to Hire Executive Director | Open Source Initiative". opensource.org. 19 November 2020. Retrieved 2021-09-20.
  32. ^ "Open Source Initiative loses corporate status [LWN.net]". lwn.net. Retrieved 2024-11-27.
  33. ^ "OSI co-founder leaves initiative over new license".
  34. ^ Perens, Bruce (2020-08-24). "What comes after Open Source?". DebConf20. Retrieved 2021-06-01.
  35. ^ a b "Co-founder of OSI Banned from Mailing Lists".
  36. ^ "The right to be rude – Armed and Dangerous". 2020-02-27. Retrieved 2024-11-27.
[edit]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Open_Source_Initiative&oldid=1259778552"